On January 14th, science teacher Jennifer McGuinn announced a new testing policy tailored to combat cheating.
McGuinn was prompted to create this policy after dealing with instances of cheating in her class.
“They are going to have to put the cell phones at the front of the room in a basket, backpacks are going to be along the side of the wall, and nobody sits at the back lab benches,” McGuinn said.
McGuinn will begin to utilize a computer program that creates different versions of the same test for each class, arranging the questions in random order. McGuinn suggested that this will most likely make the tests harder, since questions will be in a random order and not grouped together by similarity.
“The slight differences in the two of them would make it obvious if someone was looking at somebody else’s,” McGuinn said.
McGuinn spoke with fellow environmental chemistry teachers, guidance, and administration when creating the policy.
“Now that I know that somebody in my class was doing something to cheat, and I’m aware of what that was, I have to switch things so they can’t do it in the same way,” McGuinn said. “You have to try and stay ahead of it.”
Currently, the policy is effective only for McGuinn’s environmental chemistry classes; other science teachers are thinking about coming up with similar policies.
“I think that’s one of the hurtful things about cheating; you want to respect kids and believe them. You don’t want to take things away like trust,” McGuinn said. “So when you come up with policies, it takes a little piece of you trusting them and respecting them away. I would hate to see us in complete lockdown.”
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article has been revised to further protect student identity. In the original article, no students were identified by name.
anonymus • Jan 26, 2014 at 12:57 AM
WSPN is a joke
Very dissapointed • Jan 25, 2014 at 10:16 PM
This is by far the most ridiculous I have ever read on this website. It is beyond unprofessional. Writers need to think about what they put on hear. Just becuase they have such a prestigious title as a wspn journalist doesnt mean they can write what ever they want.
OX4thewin • Jan 25, 2014 at 9:52 AM
This simply is not journalism. WSPN needs to wake up and realize that most people don't like their website, because of articles like this.
OX • Jan 25, 2014 at 9:00 AM
What has WSPN become? This article has changed my views, and a whole lot other other people's views towards the website. Did you even consider asking the student who cheated if this was ok? I bet you 100% don't even care about what that student is going through. Thats why so many WHS students don't like WSPN.
Anonymous • Jan 25, 2014 at 7:54 AM
I think you all need to grow up – the purpose of journalism is to inform and educate. This article has brought to light a problem which exists at WHS (and many other high schools). The student has not been named…so it can't be unfair to them. He/she should have thought of the consequences before cheating. Maybe this will serve as a reminder that cheating is wrong and teachers are paying attention. There are some schools and colleges that kick you out if you are caught cheating.
anonymus • Jan 25, 2014 at 12:17 AM
take this whole article down
Exodus 20:13 • Jan 23, 2014 at 9:16 PM
WSPN has overstepped its boundaries with the specificity of this article. Im ashamed to see that students have willingly put an article hyper focused on the consequences of a single students mistake. This portrays this single student as a catalyst for harsh reinforcement. It pains me to say that this article has taken away legitimacy for this prominent local news source. I would have hoped that you would have the foresight to see the negative effects of this article on the "unnamed student"
Anonymus • Jan 23, 2014 at 9:15 PM
I think this article is extremely inappropriate to post. The way this article targets one student in particular is beyond rude and could be viewed as online bullying. It is sad that WSPN has turned into an online tabloid for the school and when i say tabloid i am including all the wrong hurtful and false information that comes with that title comes with. I can not believe what this site has turned into- in posting article's like these, border line yellow journalism. WSPN needs to take a step back and truly view what their values are and if they should continue down this pathetic road.
WSPN • Jan 24, 2014 at 10:05 AM
We have revised this article to protect student identity. However, WSPN stands by the validity of all information that is and was originally included in this article. All facts were verified by Jennifer McGuinn.
zxcv • Jan 24, 2014 at 11:01 AM
Do you even know what yellow journalism is?
the kid • Jan 23, 2014 at 7:39 PM
poor kid 🙁
Anonymus • Jan 23, 2014 at 5:42 PM
WSPN should be ashamed, seriously. How do you think this makes that individual who cheated feel? They are going through some hard times, and to make it public to the school like this is putting salt in the wound. I'm honestly speechless due to the fact that this was published. How would you like it if you were the one who cheated? It irks me how you thought you had to make this article literally right after the event. You couldn't wait until the situation died down? I don't get why this was published, WSPN owes a sincere apology.
WSPN • Jan 23, 2014 at 6:39 PM
The focus of this article is not on the student but on the policy change. To quote our handbook, “WSPN’s goal is to cover newsworthy events and ideas that affect the Wayland High School community, including issues that may be controversial.” We published this article because the new cheating policy is relevant, newsworthy information that is important for all WHS students to know. The student’s specific incident is included only to explain why the new policy is being implemented. Anonymity is used to protect the student’s identity.
anonymus • Jan 23, 2014 at 8:25 PM
U didn't have to single one person out. And don't act so high and mighty you could have just said the new rules. atleast act like your sorry and didn't mean any harm to the person
#reallyimature
meow • Jan 24, 2014 at 11:02 AM
Considering that this instance of cheating was the catalyst for the new policy, I think it was appropriate for WSPN to write this article. As the WHS news organization, WSPN has the responsibility to make the student community aware of important changes in policy like this. Furthermore, the student's gender, age, and identity were never revealed in the article. It does not to target the student for cheating but respectfully shows the effects of one instance of cheating.
katie34 • Jan 24, 2014 at 11:03 AM
I'm sorry I can't take your argument seriously considering you used a hashtag.
zxcv • Jan 24, 2014 at 6:57 AM
right after? this was over a week ago
anonymus • Jan 22, 2014 at 11:50 PM
this is just like mean to the person who cheated, cant believe you wrote this
the cat • Jan 24, 2014 at 12:53 PM
I truly don't understand why everyone is upset..?
They didn't use the kids name did they? The kid cheated and wspn reported without singling him out
anonymus • Jan 27, 2014 at 10:35 AM
EDITOR’S NOTE: This article has been revised to further protect student identity.
read the article next time big cat