The United States has always been proud of its freedom-enabling ideals and laws. Of the many rights we are given, we are entitled to freedom of speech, press and assembly. When combined for the purpose of protests, these three liberties have the ability to bring significant awareness to an issue and change our society.
Our country was created after a pretty successful protest: The American Revolution. The colonists in North America were frustrated with the unfair rulings of the British Government, and protested using both words and actions. The American Revolution is just one example of the many protests that have shaped our country. The American Labor Movement, the Women’s Rights Movement and the Civil Rights Movement are all famous protests that have affected our society. The ability of these protests to force change proves the astounding power of our freedoms.
Over the past two months, a new protest has formed and taken strength, both in the United States and around the world. This movement is known as the “Occupy Protest”.
The Occupy Protest has used the rights of speech, press and assembly to rapidly grow into a global movement. Photos of the protestors holding signs have appeared on news stations for weeks. Countless articles and reports on the movement, written both by protestors and observers, have been published both online and in newspapers. The protestors exercise their freedom of assembly by “occupying” a certain place, typically a center of economic power. They set up tents and stay at this site in protest. Many even celebrated Thanksgiving outside with their fellow protestors.
But what exactly are the Occupy Protests protesting? This question leads to confusion, as there have been a range of answers. In general, the “Occupy Protests” want to create more jobs, lower the number of foreclosures, reconstruct portions of our political system (particularly with regards to power distribution) and end the power of big banks and large corporations. They believe that 1% of our population, which “earned 17% of our nation’s income,” has too much power and control over our country.
The reasoning behind the Occupy Protests is justified. Our nation is on the wrong track: unemployment remains high and the economic situation isn’t improving to the extent we hoped. The future is unpredictable and unstable. We have centered our country on gaining power and money instead of on the ideals upon which we were founded. The United States of America was once a land of hope and opportunity, a land for new beginnings. In these respects, we are all disappointed, and hoping for improvements. Protests are a staple of our democratic values, thus, it is not surprising that the Occupy Protests resulted.
While the protestors may have legitimate goals, the movement itself is causing more problems than it is solving.
At the Occupy Protest locations, crime and health concerns have rightfully raised fears. The locations have become sites of violence and sexual assault. Homeless people are also congregating at the locations with the hopes of receiving warmth and food. Many fear that diseases will spread quickly and that safety is a major concern.
There is no clear goal or future to the movement, an important aspect of any protest. Most importantly, they lack reasonable fixes for the issues they are protesting. They have talked about adding new amendments, changing laws and altering political procedures. These actions all involve changes that are not well thought out and are not a long-term solution. The Occupy Protests lack a future direction and legitimate proposed solutions.
While they continue to simply occupy locations, they are costing us millions of dollars. It is reported that the first 2 months of the protest cost $13 million dollars in police overtime and services. Another report claims that in fact this number has exceeded $20 million dollars, including repairs to damaged land and property. This money could have gone towards creating more jobs, or preventing many more foreclosures or supporting another one of the Occupy protestors’ causes.
By merely occupying a location, the protests have little effect. They are raising awareness, but there are many problems with the protests that outweigh the advantages. They protestors need a clear goal and improved execution to bring about the change they desire.
Chloe Wong • Sep 30, 2014 at 11:02 PM
I agree
Louise • May 7, 2014 at 3:45 PM
It was more acknowledgement that the group wanted. It gave hope to some people and to others unity and friendship. Yes it did lack leadership, but that's what the group is fighting against – a hierarchy of rich and poor. it was a peaceful protest, the majority of images reported in the media are of police brutality. So what if homeless people are congregating in the area? it could bring to light how many people are actually living on the streets and also if they are given food and shelter in the meantime then I only see that as positive. Also small businesses near by where handing out food and water and letting some of the protestors use their facilities. its all about bringing people together, its about fighting with your neighbour not against them. Egyptian activists in particular have connected with occupy wall street physically and symbolically. “to all those in the united states currently occupying parks, squares and other spaces, your comrades in Cairo are watching you in solidarity”.
I have said a lot but I am just learning myself, I do think there was some things that could have been improved on, but i do not think that the cons outweighed the pros. x
Rebecca Stalding • Oct 8, 2012 at 11:13 PM
I agree with the article. It is very reliable. Shocking what a little "good" can do….
Ruth Walker • Jan 11, 2012 at 8:09 PM
The movement has shown value already, as the national conversation has changed to include the 99%!
The actual reference about the cost for services said:
"The heaviest financial burden has fallen upon law enforcement agencies tasked with monitoring marches and evicting protesters from outdoor camps. And the steepest costs by far piled up in New York City and Oakland, Calif., where police clashed with protesters on several occasions."
and
"In New York City, the police department has spent $7 million in overtime on the protests. But that's small change given the department's $4.5 billion budget, which allots money for emergency overtime. Last year, the NYPD spent about $550 million on overtime."
Refraining from the clashing with and evictions of the occupiers would save taxpayer dollars, so do it.
Complaints in the national news from TEA partiers are amusing, as they object to the lawlessness of the occupiers (which is, in fact, minimal) whereas the Boston Tea Party, after which the TEAists borrowed their name, were huge law breakers (and the tea they destroyed didn't even belong to the government of England).
the 99% • Dec 2, 2011 at 8:32 AM
this is biased
you are more of the 1%
mesao • Dec 2, 2011 at 8:03 PM
ehh i think most of us here in Wayland are…nonetheless I agree this is biased
Iliana Smalanskas • Dec 13, 2011 at 4:56 PM
Don't forget this is in fact our political opinion blog. When reading this, we hope to share how we see current events. We are bloggers, not news reporters, and we would never want anyone to take the opinions we share for facts.
Christine Cocce • Dec 2, 2011 at 9:50 PM
As a high school senior who will be entering college next year, I will personally have to deal with the struggles of finding a job, providing for myself, etc. in the tough economy. Many of the protestors are current college students or recent graduates who are unable to find employment.
Regardless, this article is not biased. I have clearly argued that the protestors have justified reasons for anger. I am merely saying that the protests are being operated poorly and that they do not have a strong future if they continue to protest in their current manner.
Richard Gettler • Feb 11, 2012 at 10:39 AM
True. The greatest protest have always had a goal. Is it hard to find an Occupier who can move people in2 following this movement. It seems the mofit is all or bust – meaning – if we don't get ours we're bringing down the whole machine. Problem – are people ready to break it down 2 rubble & build sumthing new on top ? What's the plan man?
come on people • Dec 1, 2011 at 3:32 PM
really now!?!?! Fox news as a source? you've basically discarded any shred of validity to your argument
Christine Cocce • Dec 2, 2011 at 9:38 PM
If you are unsatisfied with the Fox news article, please check out a recent Boston Channel article with similar information: http://www.thebostonchannel.com/news/29892039/det…
Note that the article describes "drugs, vandalism and assaultive behavior" at the Occupy protests in Boston.
nobody • Dec 1, 2011 at 1:23 PM
Honestly I still don't understand how occupying anywhere will "create more jobs, lower the number of foreclosures, reconstruct portions of our political system and end the power of big banks and large corporations."
jose • Dec 1, 2011 at 9:50 AM
i agree