In 2005, the high school barely passed the accreditation process. Because of this, according to Yes4WHS, a pro-new building group, renovations would have had to occur on the current high school facility. Yes4WHS says addressing the code violations would have cost up to $46, roughly the same amount of money that the town will be spending, with MSBA aid, on the new high school.
The same year, a different plan for a new high school failed at a special election, by a 2645 to 2005 margin.
The plan approved by voters on Wednesday calls for a two-building design to be built on the current parking lots, with the field house to remain as the main athletic center. Construction will start in the spring of 2011, and students will continue using the current facilities through the projected completion date in 2012.
Nireplah Lisab • Nov 22, 2009 at 12:09 AM
I thought it was the moderator who “then called for a tally to ensure the ayes had the necessary two-thirds majority. In an unorthodox move, he asked that just the nay votes be counted to save time.” And his name is Peter Gossels I think. Definitely not Nolan.
WSPN Editor • Nov 22, 2009 at 7:28 PM
The meeting’s moderator was Peter Gossels, not Joseph Nolan as previously reported. The error has been corrected in the article.