Although we students at WHS are older than the children featured in the video below, we, like them, will be paying off the $12 trillion in debt our government has already accumulated and a further $9 trillion that is projected to build up over the next ten years. Unless Congress is brave enough to take action now to reduce future debt, our generation will suffer.
“I pledge allegiance to America’s debt, and to the Chinese government that lends us money, and to the interest, for which we pay, compoundable, with higher taxes and lower pay, until the day we die.” ~ From DefeattheDebt.com
en Washington spends more money than it takes in through taxes, there is a budget deficit. We finance this debt by essentially taking out loans from creditors. Our three largest creditors today are China, Japan, and the United Kingdom.
This debt causes a whole host of problems. Without the easy credit from foreign governments, our own government would not be able to function. This gives non-Americans a say in American policy; in effect, we lose some of our sovereignty. Furthermore, debt could lead to hyperinflation if we try to pay off the debts by printing more money. Most importantly, debt could cause interest rates to soar, making credit less accessible.
These problems are compounded as debt increases. At $12 trillion, it’s fair to say that the United States has an extremely serious debt problem. So much of a problem, in fact, that we will soon have more debt than is legally allowed.
Under law, the federal government is only allowed to hold up to $12.1 trillion in debt. Because of this, Congress will soon have to raise the debt ceiling. Sadly, this is not uncommon. Congress has been forced to raise the debt ceiling about 100 times since 1940 when the ceiling was first raised to $50 billion. This practice is untenable.
We must reduce debt. However, there are only two ways we can do it: either increase revenue (i.e. taxes) or reduce spending. Increasing taxes is not feasible for both political and economic reasons, for taxes would have to be raised disastrously high.
This leaves only spending cuts. The best area for reducing spending is entitlements: programs like Medicare, Medicaid, and Social Security. Because of the so-called “Baby Boom tsunami,” costs in these areas are expected to skyrocket over the next two decades much faster than either GDP growth or inflation.
Hopefully the current health care reform debate will help reduce government health expenditure somewhat. However, the current legislation does not do enough. What we need is a fundamental overhaul of entitlements.
Now is the perfect opportunity to achieve this. When Congress votes to extend the debt ceiling in the next couple of months, it must take the chance to produce meaningful debt reform.
If no action is taken to reduce debt, it is going to be the classes of 2009 – 2013 who have to pay.
nobody • Jan 5, 2010 at 2:03 PM
And once again, bursting Obama's bubble, the new health care plan, while not YET responsible for any debt, will soon be costing the government a lot of money. Fisrt of all, however necessary, as civil right activists say, giving people medical care costs money. There is no way around it. And in Obama's plan, the EMPLOYERS have to pay for anyone they employ, have employed, and their children. This hurts businesses. AMERICAN businesses. Also, there will be yet another tax to pay for part of this plan. I"m sure everyone is going "Yippee!" over that. And then you add to the pile that the GOVERNMENT is controlling this. I'm all for stable governments, but the American government has a 100% track record of, while maybe effectiveness, slowing things down and complicating them (which does make sense: the government needs some kind of procedure and attempts at absolute legality). Also, basically, the American pharmaceutical industry is the most profitable part of the economy. Kind of like China's is manufacturing. This health plan significantly cuts down on this. And it reduces incentive (which, you may remember, is was why communism fails) to create anything.
Wow; I sure don't want to live in America in five years. Maybe I'll move to Canada.
nobody • Jan 5, 2010 at 2:01 PM
Also, Social Security is a major component in the national debt. Politicians refuse to touch what is called the "Third Rail" of politics, despite its problems, because 60% of the voting population is on Social Security, and messing with their income means no more votes, and no more political career. Some of us might not be aware of how the government uses Social Security. Basically, taxpayers PUT money INTO Social Security. Then, the government TAKES OUT a part of that money (which is perfectly understandable; Social Security is mostly used as a way to pay of national debt). However, due to the fact that America is so in debt (in fact, so much that some countries, like China (trade deficit much?), Japan and the United Kingdom (which not coincidentally, has an economy based on banking), are growing upset about the huge amount of money America owes them), and that people are living far longer than they used to (the Social Security Act was set in place in 1932, when the average life expectancy was about 65. NOW, it's about 78. Also, the generation of "Baby Boomers" is gradually working its way into the age of under Social Security. That means that Social Security has to pay more back to the taxpayers than it was designed to), Social Security is steadily incing towards TAKING OUT more money than it is being PUT IN. In fact, Social Security is expected to flip over some time during 2012.
nobody • Jan 5, 2010 at 2:00 PM
I think we should be asking ourselves HOW, exactly, we got into this economic mess. Here is my much abbreviated quick list (split into three parts to meet WSPN's 300-word-limit):
It can be agreed, that however popular President Obama is, his stimulus package (totaling $ 787 BILLION!) has definitely been a contributing factor to the debt (seeing as it has had almost no result on the impending economic disaster). Previous presidents have funded stimulus packages in the MILLIONS- at most.
Anon • Nov 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM
well basicly there really no hope for out generation. We will be living heavily taxed lives with little aid from the goverment.